Archive for January 2022

The arbitration award by the CCMA, which found the incapacity dismissal of a particular employee, due to her refusal to comply with the employer’s mandatory ‘vaccination’ policy, as fair, has been receiving a huge amount of attention and has been well publicised in the media. Whilst the constitutionality of mandatory vaccinations has yet to be…

On 21 January 2022, the CCMA published its award in the matter of TM v Goldrush Group (GAJB 24054-21) where it held that the dismissal of an employee who refused to be vaccinated was fair. The Commissioner was tasked with determining whether the employee’s dismissal was substantively fair based on incapacity for her refusal to be vaccinated.. Following…

When seeking to reach an agreement with an employee on the terms of a mutual separation agreement (“MSA”) or in an effort to come to the aid of an employee who faces unemployment after termination, employers might be tempted to misrepresent to the Unemployment Insurance Fund (“UIF”) that an employee was retrenched when in fact…

Section 60(2) of the Employment Equity Act 55, 1998 (“the EEA”) requires that if a sexual harassment incident is alleged at work, the employer must consult all relevant parties and must take the necessary steps to eliminate the alleged conduct. In Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd v JL and others “JL Case”, the Labour Court provided practical insights…

It is trite that the principle that the costs follow the suit does not apply in labour litigation, save for exceptional circumstances. This was emphasised by the Constitutional Court (“CC”) in two recent decisions. In National Union of Mineworkers and others v Samancor Limited (Eastern Chrome Mines) and others, the CC held that it is…